MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904326537 · doi:10.1109/ickii.2018.8569113

Tor Traffic Classification from Raw Packet Header using Convolutional Neural Network

2018· article· en· W2904326537 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2018 1st IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeaderComputer scienceTraffic classificationEncryptionDeep packet inspectionConvolutional neural networkTraffic generation modelNetwork packetArtificial intelligenceData miningMachine learningComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the amount of network traffic is growing exponentially, traffic analysis and classification are playing a significant role for efficient resource allocation and network management. However, with emerging security technologies, this work is becoming more difficult by encrypted communication such as Tor, which is one of the most popular encryption techniques. This paper proposes an approach to classify Tor traffic using hexadecimal raw packet header and convolutional neural network model. Comparing with competitive machine learning algorithms, our approach shows a remarkable accuracy. To validate this method publicly, we use UNB-CIC Tor network traffic dataset. Based on the experiments, our approach shows 99.3% accuracy for the fractionized Tor/non-Tor traffic classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it