MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904327456 · doi:10.1109/micro.2018.00020

Diffy: a Déjà vu-Free Differential Deep Neural Network Accelerator

2018· article· en· W2904327456 on OpenAlexaff
Mostafa Mahmoud, Kevin Siu, Andreas Moshovos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)ChipConvolution (computer science)ComputationArtificial neural networkEnergy (signal processing)Computer hardwareComputational scienceComputer engineeringArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that Deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) implementations of computational imaging tasks exhibit spatially correlated values. We exploit this correlation to reduce the amount of computation, communication, and storage needed to execute such CNNs by introducing Diffy, a hardware accelerator that performs Differential Convolution. Diffy stores, communicates, and processes the bulk of the activation values as deltas. Experiments show that, over five state-of-the-art CNN models and for HD resolution inputs, Diffy boosts the average performance by 7.1× over a baseline value-agnostic accelerator [1] and by 1.41× over a state-of-the-art accelerator that processes only the effectual content of the raw activation values [2]. Further, Diffy is respectively 1.83× and 1.36× more energy efficient when considering only the on-chip energy. However, Diffy requires 55% less on-chip storage and 2.5× less off-chip bandwidth compared to storing the raw values using profiled per-layer precisions [3]. Compared to using dynamic per group precisions [4], Diffy requires 32% less storage and 1.43× less off-chip memory bandwidth. More importantly, Diffy provides the performance necessary to achieve real-time processing of HD resolution images with practical configurations. Finally, Diffy is robust and can serve as a general CNN accelerator as it improves performance even for image classification models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207