Des immigrants pour la cause : la logique nationaliste du discours de presse sur l’immigration francophone en Acadie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour objectif d’examiner les idéologies linguistiques qui sous-tendent et orientent le traitement discursif de l’immigration dans la presse acadienne récente (2000-2014). Alors qu’à l’heure actuelle l’immigration canalise des tensions politiques et exacerbe des conflits nationaux dans de nombreuses sociétés occidentales, elle bénéficie d’une représentation médiatique favorable en Acadie du Nouveau-Brunswick. Or seule l’immigration dite « francophone » est jugée désirable et bénéfique, ce qui suppose une forme de régulation des communautés et des populations impliquées dans le fait français . La presse acadienne relaie principalement un discours militant sur l’immigration qui consiste à en faire une cause à défendre pour le bien commun. L’auteure montrera que l’immigration francophone a bonne presse puisqu’elle est conçue pour servir une idéologie nationaliste de la langue : parler français suppose une allégeance aux communautés acadiennes et un engagement envers l’avenir de celles-ci.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".