Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article analyse la constitution du suicide carcéral comme un problème public à la fin des années 1970 et au début des années 1980 et rend compte des expertises mobilisées et des registres d’action esquissés par le Service correctionnel du Canada. Il place la genèse de ces réformes dans le cadre plus large des transformations de l’univers carcéral, au croisement entre la promotion des droits des prisonniers, l’accroissement du contrôle des pratiques pénitentiaires, l’ouverture croissante des prisons à des intervenants extérieurs, notamment médicaux, et la reconfiguration du fonctionnement disciplinaire de l’institution. L’article montre que, même s’ils ne sont qu’esquissés dans les années 1980, les lignes de force et les points de tension des politiques de prévention du suicide en prison apparaissent nettement et selon des modalités qui seront ensuite poursuivies et approfondies, notamment autour des enjeux de recueil et partage de l’information, de classification, d’affectation et de surveillance des détenus considérés comme suicidaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".