MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904376692 · doi:10.24260/jrtie.v1i1.1066

KOMPETENSI MANAJERIAL KEPALA SEKOLAH DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN SEKOLAH EFEKTIF DI MTS MUHAMMAD BASIUNI IMRAN SAMBAS

2018· article· en· W2904376692 on OpenAlexaff
Alhadi Alhadi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Research and Thought on Islamic Education (JRTIE) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Character Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamPedagogySociologyPolitical sciencePsychologyPublic relationsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Madrasah is one of the educational institutions of Islam to educate the next generation and the most important element is the leader. As a leader, the head of the madrasah plays an important role in determining the direction of policy. In order to make the madrasah that they lead become madrasah that have competitiveness in the melinial era, these madrasah must develop effective schools. By using descriptive methods and equipped with a qualitative approach, this paper describes the effective school that has been implemented by the Head of MTs Muhammad Basaranai Imran Sambas as stated in Minister of National Education Regulation No. 19/2007 concerning Education Management Standards by Primary and Secondary Education Units. First, program planning, including; the initial planning process, the strategy of designing program planning, standards or indicators of success in achieving goals, the influence of planning on the managerial course of the principal. Second, program implementation, including; share tasks and routine explanations about work and responsibilities, build communication with all school residents well, provide motivation to colleagues so that they can work effectively and efficiently in achieving goals, running managerial based on school management guidelines, managing human resources, managing relationships with parents and the community, overcoming managerial constraints. Third, program evaluation, including; the method used in evaluating, follow-up program, the things discussed in the evaluation, and the perceived influence after evaluation. Abstrak: Madrasah merupakan salah satu lembaga pendidikan Islam yang menjadi wadah untuk mendidik generasi penerus bangsa dan elemen terpentingnya ialah pemimpin. Sebagai seorang pemimpin, kepala madrasah memegang peranan penting dalam menentukan arah kebijakan. Untuk menjadikan madrasah yang dipimpinnya menjadi madrasah yang memiliki daya saing di era melinial, madrasah tersebut harus mengembangkan sekolah efektif. Dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif dan dilengkapi dengan pendekatan kualitatif, tulisan ini menggambarkan sekolah efektif yang telah diterapkan oleh Kepala MTs Muhammad Basiuni Imran Sambas sebagaimana yang tertuang dalam Permendiknas Nomor 19 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Pengelolaan Pendidikan oleh Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Pertama, perencanaan program, meliputi; proses awal perencanaan, strategi merancang perencanaan program, standar atau indikator keberhasilan dalam pencapaian tujuan, pengaruh perencanaan terhadap jalannya manajerial kepala sekolah. Kedua, pelaksanaan program, meliputi; membagi tugas dan penjelasan rutin mengenai pekerjaan dan tangung jawab, membangun komunikasi dengan seluruh warga sekolah dengan baik, pemberian motivasi kepada rekan-rekan kerja agar dapat bekerja secara efektif dan efisien dalam pencapaian tujuan, menjalankan manajerial berdasarkan pedoman pengelolaan sekolah, mengelola SDM, mengelola hubungan dengan orang tua dan masyarakat, mengatasi kendala-kendala dalam manajerial. Ketiga, evaluasi program, meliputi; metode yang digunakan dalam melakukan evaluasi, program tindak lanjut, hal-hal yang dibicarakan dalam evaluasi, dan pengaruh yang dirasakan setelah evaluasi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Research and Thought on Islamic Education (JRTIE)Same topicEducation and Character DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207