Deoxidizing and modifying properties of alkaline earth metals within ferroalumosilicocalcium and ferrosilicobarium alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modification of alloys, in particular, by calcium and barium, is one of the promising directions for obtaining alloys with a fine crystalline structure. Complex ferroalloys – ferroalumosilicocalcium and ferrosilicobarium – were developed in the Chemical and Metallurgical Institute after Zh. Abishev. It was shown, that modification of steel by silicon-aluminum complex alloys containing chemically active elements – calcium and barium, should become one of the most effective methods to improve the quality of machine-building metal products. The chemical compositions of the smelted ferroaluminosiliconcalcium and ferrosilicobarium presented. The melting range of the nonmetallic compound formed during the deoxidation of steel by complex alloy containing calcium determined. Results of mechanical tests of the specimens of steel, modified by a complex alloy containing barium considered. A comparison of microstructure of the current production route steel and deoxidized with the complex alloys was carried out. In the course of metallographic studies of experimental steel specimens, a modifying influence on the morphology of nonmetallic inclusions by calcium and barium, supplied in a complex with aluminum and silicon alloys, was established. Metal processing by complex alloys such as ferrosilicoaluminum with calcium (FASC) and ferrosilicobarium (FSAB) indicates the possibility of achieving a higher degree of refining from oxide nonmetallic inclusions and a more even distribution of them in the ingot. The results of the industrial heats also indicated a possibility of improving of quality of casting through the decreasing of hot thermal cracks and gas-shrinkage defects, cleaner grain boundaries, a significant reduction in the number and size of carbide inclusions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".