MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904397016 · doi:10.1002/ijch.201800130

Kaolinite Clay Mineral Reactivity Improvement through Ionic Liquid Functionalization

2018· article· en· W2904397016 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gustave Kenne Dedzo

Bibliographic record

VenueIsrael Journal of Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsKaoliniteIntercalation (chemistry)ChemistryIonic liquidSurface modificationIonic bondingMineralReactivity (psychology)Clay mineralsChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryMoleculeIonOrganic chemistryMineralogyCatalysisPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Since the intercalation of 1‐ethylpyridinium chloride in the interlayer space of kaolinite in 2005, several other ionic liquids (ILs) have been successfully intercalated. Unlike other clay minerals that display charged structural units, kaolinite is almost neutral. ILs intercalation in kaolinite results in both the cation and the anion in the interlayer space. The confinement of ILs in this two‐dimensional polarized space is of numerous interests, with certainly the most important to be discovered. Moreover, kaolinite interlayer space is decorated by a dense network of hydroxyl functions that can be easily functionalized. Recent study demonstrates that it is possible to synthesize ILs from simple organic molecules whose cations can be permanently grafted into the interlayer space of kaolinite. This review presents the results obtained in kaolinite functionalization by ILs, by focusing on the synthesis, applications and potential perspectives offered by these new nanohybrid materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsrael Journal of ChemistrySame topicClay minerals and soil interactionsFrench-language works237,207