Pengaruh Penggabungan Metode Outdoor Dengan Indoor Learning Menggunakan Sistem Sepur Selam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penggabungan metode Outdoor dengan Indoor Learning menggunakan sistem sepekan di luar sepekan di dalam (SEPUR SELAM) terhadap prestasi belajar siswa pada pokok bahasan Polinomial kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Tawangsari tahun pelajaran 2017/2018. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian eksperimen semu. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan tes, dokumentasi, angket, observasi, dan wawancara. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI IPA 3 sebagai kelas kontrol dan XI IPA 5 sebagai kelas eksperimen. Hasil analisis uji-t menunjukkan bahwa thitung = 6,098 > ttabel = 2,288 maka H0 ditolak. Disimpulkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh penggunaan penggabungan metode Outdoor dengan Indoor Learning menggunakan Sistem Sepekan di Luar Sepekan di Dalam (SEPUR SELAM) terdahap prestasi belajar siswa pada pokok bahasan Polinomial. Sedangkan angket respon siswa menyatakan 100% siswa tertarik dan mengalami kondisi pembelajaran yang berbeda dengan penggabungan metode Outdoor dengan Indoor Learning, sedangkan 97,4% siswa termotivasi dan tidak mengalami kejenuhan. Kata kunci: Outdoor Learning;Indoor Learning;hasil belajar matematika Abstract: His research aims to determine the effect of combining Outdoor methods with Indoor Learning using a week-long system within a week in (SEPUR SELAM) on student achievement on the subject of Polynomial class XI Science at SMA Negeri 1 Tawangsari in the academic year 2017/2018. The type of research used is experimental research. Data were collected using tests, documentation, questionnaires, observations, and interviews. The sample in this study were students of class XI IPA 3 as the control class and XI IPA 5 as the experimental class. The result of the t-test analysis shows that t count = 6.098> t table = 2.288 then H0 is rejected. It was concluded that there was an effect of using the combination of Outdoor methods with Indoor Learning using the Sepekan System outside the Week in (SEPUR SELAM) at the level of students' learning achievement on the subject of Polynomial. While the student response questionnaire stated 100% of students were interested and experienced different learning conditions with the incorporation of Outdoor methods with Indoor Learning, while 97.4% of students were motivated and did not experience saturation. Keyword: Outdoor Learning;Indoor Learning; learning outcomes of mathematics
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".