MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904405888 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2018.8558412

High Efficiency Wide Input Voltage Range LCLC Resonant Converter Using Nonlinear Frequency Controller

2018· article· en· W2904405888 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Sheng, Yang Chen, Hongliang Wang, Yan‐Fei Liu, Paresh C. Sen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltageInductanceController (irrigation)Electronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Boost converterBuck–boost converterElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Control (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In server and telecommunication applications, LLC resonant converter featuring high efficiency and high power density becomes an excellent candidate for the frontend DC/DC stage. But, for conventional LLC converter, the performance will be severely deteriorated once the converter is designed for accommodating regulation over wide input voltage range. A modified LLC topology with changeable magnetizing inductance, LCLC resonant converter, has been successfully proved to extend the input voltage range without sacrificing the normal efficiency. Moreover, due to the strong nonlinear feature of the LCLC resonant converter, conventional linear control strategies such as PI controller are very hard to optimize. This paper proposes a nonlinear frequency control method for LCLC converter to achieve better output voltage regulation over wide input voltage range. In the controller, the switching frequency is calculated from a quadratic function, which expresses the opposite variation of the voltage gain. Finally, a 250-400V input 12V/500W output LCLC prototype is built and tested. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed nonlinear frequency control strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207