Migraciones, acción colectiva y colonialidad del saber en el campo académico español : los y las migrantes como sujetos políticos invisibles / invisibilizados.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the presence/absence of migrants understood as political actors in the Spanish academic literature. First, the author will explore the field of Migration Studies, reviewing the papers presented in five scientific conferences celebrated between 2004-2012, as well as the articles published in the specialized journal Migraciones. ften the author will analyse the papers related to collective action presented in the last four conferences of the Spanish Sociological Association. fte study reveals the existence of a double absence: with very few exceptions those scholars studying migrants do not pay attention to collective action, whereas those studying collective action do not pay attention to migrants. ftese findings call for an intense epistemological vigilance in order to acknowledge the limits of our vision, and impel us to problematize and unsettle the coloniality of knowledge constituting our disciplines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it