MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904443801 · doi:10.31390/cwbr.20.4.07

Jim Crow North: The Struggle for Equal Rights in Antebellum New England

2018· article· en· W2904443801 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCivil War Book Review · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperCivil rightsLegislationCensusGovernment (linguistics)LawNew englandHistoryGenealogyPolitical sciencePoliticsSociologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Jim Crow North: The Struggle for Equal Rights in Antebellum New England, Richard Archer explores the African-American quest for liberty and equality from the early 1700s, a period when slave codes in the Northeast mirrored those put in place in the Chesapeake, through to the outbreak of the American Civil War. Using an array of primary sources, including eighteenth- and nineteenth-century newspapers, government legislation, court records, census data, and personal correspondence, he crafts a gripping story of courageous black New Englanders challenging discrimination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it