An Iodide-Based Complexing Agent for the Zinc-Iodide Flow Battery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of iodide-based complexing agent on the electrochemical performance of zinc-iodide flow battery was investigated. The addition of a complexing agent that will stabilize triiodide during charging can reduce the self-discharge and increase the charge and voltaic efficiency. The hydrogen evolution and kinetics of the both electrode reactions in the presence of the complexing agent was assessed. Cyclic voltammetry and Tafel analysis were performed to evaluate the influence of complexing agent on zinc electrochemical kinetics. The results indicated that the complexing agent enhances the cell performance by increasing the kinetics, which will enable operation of the battery at increased current density, or increases in the charge-discharge efficiency. At the positive electrode a deposit was observed on the electrode surface. The deposit was characterized by SEM and EDS and the deposition process was found to change significantly in the presence of the complexing agent. The charge-discharge characteristics of the electrolyte system were investigated in an H-type glass cell, and polarization curves were obtained for the two half-cell reactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".