Connaître, conduire et consommer les eaux douces d’après les auteurs de la Rome antique du Ier siècle av. J.-C. au IIe siècle ap. J.-C.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La ville de Rome s’est développée dans un rapport étroit avec les eaux douces. À partir de la fin du IV e siècle av. J.-C., les Romains se dotèrent d’aqueducs pour rendre l’eau plus largement accessible à la population. Cette étude interroge les connaissances romaines en matière d’hydrologie par une analyse de sources littéraires de la République et du Haut Empire. Trois aspects sont abordés : les propriétés des eaux, les manières de trouver et de conduire l’eau de bonne qualité, puis celles d’en consommer. Elle ouvre également des pistes de réflexion sur les rapports culturels entre les Romains et l’eau.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it