MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904511024 · doi:10.4000/quaderni.1250

Le capitalisme et ses critiques : l’anti-libéralisme dans la politique française contemporaine

2018· article· fr· W2904511024 on OpenAlex
Émile Chabal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malgré une transformation en profondeur du paysage politique depuis les années 1980, les français restent particulièrement hostiles au libéralisme. Dans cet article, je tente d’élucider ce paradoxe en analysant une des formes d’antilibéralisme les plus connues : l’anticapitalisme de gauche. À travers quatre textes clés – Adieux au prolétariat (1980) d’André Gorz, « République et démocratie » (1989) de Régis Debray, Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme (1999) de Luc Boltanski et Ève Chiapello et La nouvelle raison du monde (2010) de Pierre Dardot et Christian Laval – je trace l’émergence d’un nouveau discours anticapitaliste qui s’appuie désormais sur des concepts tel que « l’esprit » et « la raison », plutôt que sur des idées de « classe » ou de « révolution ». On découvre alors, que même si la pensée anticapitaliste de gauche critique explicitement le capitalisme néolibéral du XXIe siècle, elle s’est aussi adaptée à la diffusion et l’émiettement du pouvoir dans un monde néolibéral.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it