MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904540787 · doi:10.1109/lsc.2018.8572190

State Based Hidden Markov Models for Temporal Pattern Discovery in Critical Care

2018· article· en· W2904540787 on OpenAlex
Catherine Inibhunu, Carolyn McGregor

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHidden Markov modelAbstractionTemporal databaseProcess (computing)Event (particle physics)Data miningSet (abstract data type)Business process discoveryMachine learningData scienceArtificial intelligenceWork in process

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are studying the challenge of finding a good set of features that represent well the temporal aspects in time series data. We argue that discovery of such features could be crucial to understanding hidden relationships in data. In particular, in critical care where time oriented data is generated every second on patients physiological features, discovery of any hidden relationships could aid in discovery of unknown and potentially life threatening conditions before they happen. Additionally, this discovery could help in better dissemination of healthcare services leading to better outcomes and experiences for patients. To facilitate this process, this research explores two research questions; (a) can discovery of temporal relationships in data help in learning hidden aspects in differing patient cohort and (b) with respect to elderly patients receiving telehealth services, can detection of abnormal patterns help in identifying patients at risk of adverse events before they happen. In this paper, we introduce a model for temporal pattern mining by; (1) applying principles from finite state machines augmented with hidden markov models and temporal abstraction for identifying temporal relations in data, (2) generating temporal patterns by augmenting similar relationships, (3) formulating a process for mining frequently occurring temporal patterns and (4) using the resulting mined patterns to build a temporal classification system. Such a classification system can be effective at characterizing normal and abnormal behaviors in patients data and flag when a patient is at risk of a potential adverse event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207