Hybrid quantum-classical simulation of quantum speed limits in open quantum systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The quantum speed limit (QSL) provides a fundamental upper bound on the speed of quantum evolution, but its evaluation in generic open quantum systems still presents a formidable computational challenge. Herein, we introduce a hybrid quantum-classical method for computing QSL times in multi-level open quantum systems. The method is based on a mixed Wigner–Heisenberg representation of the composite quantum dynamics, in which the open subsystem of interest is treated quantum mechanically and the bath is treated in a classical-like fashion. By solving a set of coupled first-order deterministic differential equations for the quantum and classical degrees of freedom, one can compute the QSL time. To demonstrate the utility of the method, we study the unbiased spin-boson model and provide a detailed analysis of the effect of the subsystem-bath coupling strength and bath temperature on the QSL time. In particular, we find a turnover of the QSL time in the strong coupling regime, which is indicative of a speed-up in the quantum evolution. We also apply the method to the Fenna–Matthews–Olson complex model and identify a potential connection between the QSL time and the efficiency of the excitation energy transfer at different temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".