MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904586858 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.065

Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Therapy in a Patient With Severe Enterocolitis Associated With a STAT3 Gain-of-Function Mutation

2018· article· en· W2904586858 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marianna Parlato, Fabienne Charbit‐Henrion, Elie Abi Nader, Bernadette Bègue, Nicolas Guégan, Julie Bruneau, Shérine Khater, Elizabeth Macintyre, Capucine Pïcard, Rieux-Laucat Frédéric, Lionel Le Bourhis, Matthieu Allez, Olivier Goulet, Christophe Cellier, Olivier Hermine, Nadine Cerf–Bensussan, Georgia Malamut

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheInstitut des maladies génétiques ImagineFondation Maladies RaresRare Disease Foundation
KeywordsEnteropathyMedicineRuxolitinibImmune dysregulationEnterocolitisDiseaseMutationNecrotizing enterocolitisImmunologyImmunodeficiencyInternal medicineImmune systemGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Severe enterocolitis raises diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Empirical treatment by steroids and immunosuppressive drugs is commonly used but, to date, little attempt has been made to specifically target the mechanism underlying inflammation. Possible causes of severe enterocolitis include refractory celiac disease,1 autoimmune enteropathy,2 and common variable immunodeficiency,3 the 2 latter being overlapping entities of possible monogenic inheritance. Besides FOXP3 mutations that cause immune dysregulation polyendocrinopathy X-linked syndrome,4 additional genetic causes have recently been reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterologySame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207