MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904617426 · doi:10.20381/ruor-22215

IMEX and Semi-Implicit Runge-Kutta Schemes for CFD Simulations

2018· dissertation· en· W2904617426 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Arman Rokhzadi

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamicsRunge–Kutta methodsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematicsMechanicsPhysicsMathematical analysisDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) and climate models parametrize the effects of boundary-layer turbulence as a diffusive process, dependent on a diffusion coefficient, which appears as nonlinear terms in the governing equations. In the advection dominated zone of the boundary layer and in the free atmosphere, the air flow supports different wave motions, with the fastest being the sound waves. Time integrations of these terms, in both zones, need to be implicit otherwise they impractically restrict the stable time step sizes. At the same time, implicit schemes may lose accuracy compared to explicit schemes in the same level, which is due to dispersion error associated with these schemes. Furthermore, the implicit schemes need iterative approaches like the Newton-Raphson method. Therefore, the combination of implicit and explicit methods, called IMEX or semi-implicit, has extensively attracted attention. In the combined method, the linear part of the equation as well as the fast wave terms are treated by the implicit part and the rest is calculated by the explicit scheme. Meanwhile, minimizing the dissipation and dispersion errors can enhance the performance of time integration schemes, since the stability and accuracy will be restricted by these inevitable errors. Hence, the target of this thesis is to increase the stability range, while obtaining accurate solutions by using IMEX and semi-implicit time integration methods. Therefore, a comprehensive effort has been made toward minimizing the numerical errors to develop new Runge-Kutta schemes, in IMEX and semi-implicit forms, to temporally integrate the governing equations in the atmospheric field so that the stability is extended and accuracy is improved, compared to the previous schemes. At the first step, the A-stability and the Strong Stability Preserving (SSP) optimized properties were compared as two essential properties of the time integration schemes. It was shown that both properties attempt to minimize the dissipation and dispersion errors, but in two different aspects. The SSP optimized property focuses on minimizing the errors to increase the accuracy limits, while the A-stability property tries to extend the range of stability. It was shown that the combination of both properties is essential in the field of interest. Moreover, the A-stability property was found as an essential property to accelerate the steady state solutions. Afterward, the dissipation and dispersion errors, generated by three-stage second order IMEX Runge-Kutta scheme were minimized, while the proposed scheme, so called IMEX-SSP2(2,3,2) enjoys the A-stability and SSP properties. A practical governing equation set in the atmospheric field, so called compressible Boussinesq equations set, was calculated using the new IMEX scheme and the results were compared to one well-known IMEX scheme in the literature, i.e. ARK2(2,3,2), which is an abbreviation of Additive Runge-Kutta. Note that, the ARK2(2,3,2) was compared to various types of IMEX Runge-Kutta schemes and it was found as the more efficient scheme in the atmospheric fields (Weller et al., 2013). It was shown that the IMEX-SSP2(2,3,2) could improve the accuracy and extend the range of stable time step sizes as well. Through the van der Pol test case, it was shown that the ARK2(2,3,2) with L-stability property may decline to the first order in the calculation of stiff limit, while IMEX-SSP2(2,3,2), with A-stability property, is able to retain the assigned second order of accuracy. Therefore, it was concluded that the L-stability property, due to restrictive conditions associated with, may weaken the time integration’s performance, compared to the A-stability property. The ability of the IMEX-SSP2(2,3,2) was proved in solving different case, which is the inviscid Burger equation in spherical coordinate system by using a realistic initial condition dataset. In the next step, it was attempted to maximize the non-negativity property associated with the numerical stability function of three-stage third order Diagonally Implicit Runge-Kutta (DIRK) schemes. It was shown that the non-negativity has direct relation with non-oscillatory behaviors. Two new DIRK schemes with A- and L-stability properties, respectively, were developed and compared to the SSP(3,3), which obtains the SSP optimized property in the same class of DIRK schemes. The SSP optimized property was found to be more beneficial for the inviscid (advection dominated) flows, since in the von Neumann stability analysis, the SSP optimized property provides more nonnegative region for the imaginary component of the stability function. However, in most practical cases, i.e. the viscous (advection diffusion) flows, the nonnegative property is needed for both real and imaginary components of the stability function. Therefore, the SSP optimized property, individually, is not helpful, unless mixed with the A-stability property. Meanwhile, the A- and L-stability properties were compared as well. The intention is to find how these properties influence the DIRK schemes’ performances. The A-stability property was found as preserving the SSP property more than the L-stability property. Moreover, the proposed A-stable scheme tolerates larger Courant Friedrichs Lewy (CFL) number, while preserving the accuracy and non-oscillatory computations. This fact was proved in calculating different test cases, including compressible Euler and nonlinear viscous Burger equations. Finally, the time integration of the boundary layer flows was investigated as well. The nonlinearity associated with the diffusion coefficient makes the implicit scheme impractical, while the explicit scheme inefficiently limits the stable time step sizes. By using the DIRK scheme, a new semi-implicit approach was proposed, in which the diffusion coefficient at each internal stage is calculated by a weight-averaged combination of the solutions at current internal stage and previous time step, in which the time integration can benefit from both explicit and implicit advantages. As shown, the accuracy was improved, which is due to engaging the explicit solutions and the stability was extended due to taking advantages of implicit scheme. It was found that the nominated semi-implicit method results in less dissipation error, more accurate solutions and less CPU time usage, compared to the implicit schemes, and it enjoys larger range of stable time steps than other semi-implicit approaches in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207