Quelle place pour le citoyen dans la gouvernance communautaire francophone en contexte minoritaire ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La gouvernance communautaire en milieu francophone minoritaire s’érige sur des assises qui sont parfois fragiles. La crise récente à la Société de l’Acadie du Nouveau-Brunswick (SANB) a mis en lumière les tensions au sein de la gouvernance acadienne entre les intérêts des citoyens et ceux des organismes sectoriels. Dans notre article, nous analysons ce cas afin de mieux comprendre cette tension qui est coeur de la gouvernance acadienne au Nouveau-Brunswick. Il s’agit d’une étude exploratoire qui s’appuie principalement sur une recherche documentaire et sur nos observations effectuées pendant notre travail de soutien à la SANB dans le cadre de sa récente restructuration. Ce cas montre qu’il peut être difficile de concilier une vision citoyenne et une vision organisationnelle (sectorielle) de la gouvernance communautaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".