MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904631187 · doi:10.1063/1.5058136

Quantumness in light harvesting is determined by vibrational dynamics

2018· article· en· W2904631187 on OpenAlexafffund
Mike Reppert, Paul Brumer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsQuantumExcitationHamiltonian (control theory)Energy transferContext (archaeology)Quantum mechanicsStatistical physicsAtomic physicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate for the multi-level spin-boson (MLSB) Hamiltonian, typically used to describe biological light-harvesting, that the distinction between quantum and classical dynamics is determined entirely by the thermal environment. In particular, any MLSB model featuring classical interactions with a classical bath is exactly equivalent in its absorption and energy transfer dynamics to a classical model involving coupled harmonic oscillators. This result holds in the linear response regime for both pulsed and incoherent excitation. In the biological context, this finding highlights the centrality of vibrational dynamics in determining the "quantumness" of photosynthetic light-harvesting, particularly in the creation of the photosynthetic energy funnel where excitation energy concentrates near the reaction center via a series of downhill energy transfer events. These findings support the idea that this energy funnel is exclusively quantum-mechanical in origin, although it need not rely on entanglement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207