Prediction of physical and mechanical properties of thermally modified wood based on color change evaluated by means of “group method of data handling” (GMDH) neural network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The effect of thermal modification (TM) on the color of western hemlock wood and its physical and mechanical properties were investigated. The focus of this study was the prediction of material properties of thermally modified wood based on the color change via the “group method of data handling (GMDH)” neural network (NN). The NN was trained by color parameters for predicting the equilibrium moisture content (EMC), density, porosity, water absorption (WA), swelling coefficient, dynamic modulus of elasticity (MOE dyn ) and hardness. The color parameters showed a significant correlation with temperature and are well correlated with the heat treatment (HT) intensity. Color parameters combined with the GMDH-type NN successfully predicted the physical properties of the material. The best correlation was achieved with the swelling coefficient, EMC and WA. All these properties were significantly influenced by HT. The color parameters did not seem suitable for predicting the wood hardness and MOE dyn . The GMDH NN shows a higher model accuracy than the multivariate linear and partial least squares (PLS) regression models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it