Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenueJournal of Instrumentation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFCarleton UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaYork UniversityUniversity of VictoriaMcGill UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalInstitute of Particle PhysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsRoyal SocietyCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueEuropean Social FundEuropean Regional Development FundMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"Israel Science FoundationComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftAustrian Science FundU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAgence Nationale de la RechercheServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesGeneralitat de CatalunyaDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)CanarieCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaCERNDanmarks Grundforskningsfond
KeywordsPhysicsLarge Hadron ColliderElectronNuclear physicsAtlas (anatomy)PhotonCalibrationDetectorProtonAbsolute scaleParticle physicsATLAS experimentAtomic physicsOptics
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexThis paper presents the electron and photon energy calibration obtained with the ATLAS detector using about 36 fb$^{-1}$ of LHC proton-proton collision data recorded at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV in 2015 and 2016. The different calibration steps applied to the data and the optimization of the reconstruction of electron and photon energies are discussed. The absolute energy scale is set using a large sample of $Z$ boson decays into electron--positron pairs. The systematic uncertainty in the energy scale calibration varies between 0.03% to 0.2% in most of the detector acceptance for electrons with transverse momentum close to 45 GeV. For electrons with transverse momentum of 10 GeV the typical uncertainty is 0.3% to 0.8% and it varies between 0.25% and 1% for photons with transverse momentum around 60 GeV. Validations of the energy calibration with $J/ψ\rightarrow e^+e^-$ decays and radiative $Z$ boson decays are also presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.222
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
