MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904652500 · doi:10.3828/qs.2018.19

Des marranes au Québec? Tensions identitaires et judéité dans <i>Une Juive en Nouvelle-France</i> de Pierre Lasry

2018· article· fr· W2904652500 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simone Grossman

Bibliographic record

VenueQuebec Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtJudaismJewish identityPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous analyserons le roman de Pierre Lasry Une Juive en Nouvelle-France (2000) où est relatée l’histoire authentique d’Esther Brandeau, unique personne juive arrivée clandestinement en 1738 en Nouvelle-France sous une identité masculine puis rembarquée pour la France en 1739 parce qu’elle refusait de devenir catholique. Nous montrerons la continuité entre ses pérégrinations et celles de ses ancêtres marranes fuyant l’Inquisition en 1498. Nous envisagerons la double dimension géographique et spirituelle de ses errances. Portant le nom de la reine Esther biblique voilant son origine juive pour sauver son peuple, Esther Brandeau emblématise la dimension féminine du marranisme. Le métissage linguistique par lequel des mots d’hébreu et de portugais sont mêlés au français présentifie le marranisme comme un « écartèlement » entre les langues, représentatif de la « civilisation juive en marche vers la modernité » (Lasry 2007). Nous verrons que le roman dévoile la dimension intergénérationnelle inédite d’un marranisme des origines sous-jacent à l’identité québécoise postmoderne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuebec StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207