MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904654403 · doi:10.26522/vp.v15i2.2078

Représentation de la sexualité et des pratiques sexuelles à l’ère des réseaux sociaux dans Satyriasis : (mes années romantiques) de Guillaume Lambert

2018· article· fr· W2904654403 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Guillaume Girard

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix Plurielles · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une analyse de la représentation des pratiques sexuelles et de la sexualité du narrateur du roman Satyriasis : (mes années romantiques), publié en 2015 par l’écrivain québécois Guillaume Lambert. Pour ce faire, une attention particulière est accordée aux comportements sexuels du narrateur, qui cherche à surmonter sa rupture amoureuse avec Paolo en multipliant les rencontres grâce aux réseaux sociaux. L’objectif est de faire ressortir le rapport que le narrateur entretient avec la sexualité et la façon dont les sites et applications de rencontre auxquels il recourt influencent ses comportements sexuels. Les concepts de dispositif (Agamben), de capital érotique (Hakim), d’orientations intimes de soi (Bozon), d’échange économico-sexuel (Tabet), d’ère pharmacopornographique (Preciado) ainsi que de circuit productif excitation-frustration-excitation (Preciado) sont mobilisés pour rendre compte du mal-être affectivo-sexuel du narrateur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.011
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix PluriellesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207