MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904662989 · doi:10.1177/1081286518814289

Stationary solutions for a new hybrid quantum model for semiconductors with discontinuous pressure functional and relaxation time

2018· article· en· W2904662989 on OpenAlexaff
Federica Di Michele, Ming Mei, Bruno Rubino, Rosella Sampalmieri

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Solids · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsChamplain Regional CollegeMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniquenessGeneralizationLimit (mathematics)Relaxation (psychology)MathematicsTensor (intrinsic definition)Constant (computer programming)QuantumApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we propose a generalization of the hybrid model for semiconductors already discussed by Chiarelli et al.and Di Michele et al., including a non-constant pressure functional and relaxation time. Roughly speaking, we assume that the normalized electron temperature and the relaxation time in the classical and quantum domains are different from each other. We derive the model heuristically, introducing a generalization of the stress tensor, which accounts for an interface contribute, and afterwards we prove the existence and uniqueness of weak solutions for such a new hybrid model. We apply the approach proposed by Di Michele et al. to obtain the stationary solutions to our problem, namely we prove the existence of the solution for a regularized problem, then we achieve the existence of a weak solution for the hybrid problem as a proper limit of the regular solution previously obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics and Mechanics of SolidsSame topicNavier-Stokes equation solutionsFrench-language works237,207