MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904702271 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.11340

Chapitre 7. Superviser des stagiaires à distance avec les technologies

2017· book-chapter· fr· W2904702271 on OpenAlexaffabout
Glorya Pellerin

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Québec, les étudiants en formation initiale doivent, depuis 1994, réaliser un minimum de 700 heures de stage, idéalement dans différents milieux scolaires (MELS, 2008). Dans certaines régions du Québec, les écoles sont situées à des distances considérables de l’université, ce qui complique le processus de supervision, notamment celui de type clinico-pédagogique. Le superviseur peut difficilement assurer sa présence afin d’accompagner le stagiaire en raison des nombreux kilomètres à parcour...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207