MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904766437 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1700094

Variation in Platinum Group Mineral and Base Metal Sulfide Assemblages in the Lower Group Chromitites of the Western Bushveld Complex, South Africa

2018· article· en· W2904766437 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kai Bachmann, Inga Osbahr, Raimon Tolosana‐Delgado, Deshenthree Chetty, Jens Gutzmer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHelmholtz free energyPlatinum groupGeographyGeologyGeochemistryPhysicsChemistryPlatinum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| September 01, 2018 Variation in Platinum Group Mineral and Base Metal Sulfide Assemblages in the Lower Group Chromitites of the Western Bushveld Complex, South Africa Kai Bachmann; Kai Bachmann § Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany §Corresponding author e-mail address: k.bachmann@hzdr.de Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Inga Osbahr; Inga Osbahr 3Deutsche Rohstoffagentur (DERA) at the Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Wilhelmstrasse 25-30, 13593 Berlin-Spandau, Germany Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Raimon Tolosana-Delgado; Raimon Tolosana-Delgado Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Deshenthree Chetty; Deshenthree Chetty Mineralogy Division, Mintek, Malibongwe Drive, 2125 Randburg, South Africa Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Jens Gutzmer Jens Gutzmer Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Kai Bachmann § Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany Inga Osbahr 3Deutsche Rohstoffagentur (DERA) at the Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Wilhelmstrasse 25-30, 13593 Berlin-Spandau, Germany Raimon Tolosana-Delgado Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany Deshenthree Chetty Mineralogy Division, Mintek, Malibongwe Drive, 2125 Randburg, South Africa Jens Gutzmer Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany §Corresponding author e-mail address: k.bachmann@hzdr.de Publisher: Mineralogical Association of Canada First Online: 11 Oct 2018 Online Issn: 1499-1276 Print Issn: 0008-4476 © 2018 Mineralogical Association of Canada The Canadian Mineralogist (2018) 56 (5): 723–743. https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.1700094 Article history First Online: 11 Oct 2018 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Kai Bachmann, Inga Osbahr, Raimon Tolosana-Delgado, Deshenthree Chetty, Jens Gutzmer; Variation in Platinum Group Mineral and Base Metal Sulfide Assemblages in the Lower Group Chromitites of the Western Bushveld Complex, South Africa. The Canadian Mineralogist 2018;; 56 (5): 723–743. doi: https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.1700094 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyThe Canadian Mineralogist Search Advanced Search Abstract The Lower Group chromitites of the Bushveld Igneous Complex are mined for chromite as a primary product. The recovery of platinum group elements and base metals (Ni, Cu) as by products has the potential to add value to the chromite resources. This study focuses on the LG-6 and LG-6A chromitite seams at the Thaba mine located on the western limb of the Bushveld Complex. Platinum group minerals and base-metal sulfides are studied by mineral liberation analysis and electron microprobe analysis to define distinct assemblages and to evaluate the potential for beneficiation. Based on the results, two distinct major mineral assemblages are defined. The first assemblage is rich in platinum group element-sulfides, along with variable proportions of malanite/cuprorhodsite and alloys of Fe and Sn. The associated base metal sulfides are dominated by chalcopyrite and pentlandite, along with pyrite and subordinate millerite/violarite. Associated silicates are mainly primary magmatic orthopyroxene and plagioclase. The second assemblage is rich in platinum group element-sulfarsenides and -arsenides as well as -antimonides and -bismuthides and is associated with a base metal sulfide assemblage dominated by pentlandite and Co-rich pentlandite. The second assemblage is also marked by an abundance of alteration minerals, such as talc, serpentine, and/or carbonates, which are closely associated with the platinum group minerals. Statistical evaluation reveals that the two mineral assemblages cannot be attributed to their derivation from different chromitite seams but document the effects of pervasive hydrothermal alteration. Alteration evidently had similar effects on the different chromitite seams. The occurrence and distribution of the two characteristic assemblages has important implications for beneficiation. Assemblages rich in platinum group element-sulfides associated with base metal sulfides respond well to flotation, unlike the alteration assemblages rich in arsenides, antimonides, and bismuthides. The nature of the gangue minerals will also impact platinum-group mineral recovery, as high phyllosilicate abundances, such as those encountered in the alteration assemblage, may cause problems during flotation and lead to poor recoveries. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207