MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904768409 · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.023415

Laser-cooled cesium atoms confined with a magic-wavelength dipole trap inside a hollow-core photonic-bandgap fiber

2019· article· en· W2904768409 on OpenAlexafffund
Taehyun Yoon, Michal Bajcsy

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIndustry Canada
KeywordsAtomic physicsCaesiumDipoleWavelengthLaserCore (optical fiber)Atom (system on chip)Materials sciencePhysicsOpticsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report loading of laser-cooled cesium atoms into a hollow-core photonic-band gap fiber and confining the atoms in the fiber's $7\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$-diameter core with a magic-wavelength dipole trap at $\ensuremath{\sim}935$ nm. The use of the magic wavelength removes the ac Stark shift of the 852 nm optical transition in cesium caused by the dipole trap in the fiber core and suppresses the inhomogeneous broadening of the atomic ensemble that arises from the radial distribution of the atoms. This opens the possibility to continuously probe the atoms over timescales of a millisecond---approximately 1000 times longer than what was reported in previous works, because the dipole trap does not have to be modulated. We describe our atom-loading setup and its unique features and present spectroscopy measurements of the cesium's ${D}_{2}$ line in the continuous-wave dipole trap with up to $1.7\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{4}$ loaded inside the hollow-core fiber.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207