MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2904769483

The Cardio Myth Smashed â Why Your Running Shoes May Be Packing On The Pounds

2018· article· en· W2904769483 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kyle Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

\n Independent clinical research across the globe now clearly demonstrates that cardio vascular exercise such as running has little to no effect on weight loss and, if overdone, can actually cause muscle loss and lead to heart attack.\n \n \n \n Official Website\n \n \n Are you like most westerners and believe that when it comes time to shed some LB’s that you need to strap on the old runners and hit the treadmill, exercise bike or the pavement? Have you ever noticed that you sweat like a pig, gasp for breath and yet… and yet never quite get the results you want?\n Unfortunately, common fitness beliefs in countries like the U.S., Canada, the UK, Australia and other nations say that busting your hump with hours of cardio is the best way to lose weight. The truth, backed by thousands of studies as well as the experience of many seasoned personal trainers, says that this is in fact a myth.\n On average, low intensity and long term cardio such as walking and jogging burns only about 5 calories per minute. That means that even after an hour, only 300 calories have been burned. While this type of cardio is great for maintaining your weight and promoting cardio vascular health, it has little effect on fat loss simply because the exercise just doesn’t’ eliminate enough calories to cause your body to begin to burn fat.\n On the other end of the spectrum, high intensity running, for example, does burn more calories. However, you need recovery time between workouts, so the net effect is the same. That’s not the end of the bad news, however.\n Hard running also puts a tremendous strain on your joints and can build up scar tissue on your heart leading to potential heart attack. These medical dangers aside, hard cardio also tends to put your body into a catabolic state.\n Catabolic is a term that refers to a state when the body, starved of nutrients, begins to feed on itself in order to acquire the energy it needs. Unfortunately, this means muscle tissue. Hard running can deplete muscle mass while having little effect on fat loss. In fact, heavy runners have to load up on carbs in order to maintain their weight and only add to the dilemma.\n In his breakthrough weight loss program, Fat Decimator, former marine and fitness expert Kyle Cooperexposes the cardio myth along with other damaging fitness beliefs that keep over 90% of people in western nations from being able to truly tackle and defeat their weight issues. His program, designed along with Korean internal medicine and bio-chemistry expert Doctor Sam Pak, exposes the lies of today’s fitness industry and combines ancient Asian wisdom with independently tested and proven scientific studies in a comprehensive and wildly successful weight loss program.\n “Doctor Pak truly opened my eyes,” Former Gunnery Sergeant Kyle Cooper explains, “He showed me that the ways I’ve been training my marines for over a decade was flawed and how some of the things I based my exercise and eating routines on were actually having the opposite effect.”\n Doctor Pak explains, “The body has its own way of dealing with food, fat storage and the use of the metabolism to burn unnecessary fat deposits. Ironically, much of what western culture believes is healthy is in fact detrimental to the natural bio-chemical processes.”\n “Hard cardio, eliminating salt and carbs and even certain fruits and vegetables thought to be healthy all combine to throw off your body’s metabolism and its ability to digest food and fight destructive acids. Kyle and I have put together something that’s based on ancient wisdom backed by sound science.”\n \n Fat Decimator works in harmony with the body’s natural cycles. It requires no starvation diets, no exhausting exercise, no gadgets, and no disgusting foods and even allows you to eat many of the things you enjoy. It’s a simple step by step formula that’s helped more than 50,000 people shed huge amounts of weight safely and in record time. Including one woman in her early 40’s whose weight and health nearly killed her.\n In his free presentation, Kyle tells the story of Sharon – a mother who discovered that her weight had brought her to the brink of death from heart attack. Kyle was able to work with her and allowed Sharon to lose over 40 pounds in a single month and completely turn her life around.\n \n Fat Decimator has proven itself to be remarkable both in its simplicity and its effectiveness. Average weight losses of 7 pounds per week are not unheard of.\n \n What users have to say:\n \n Janet O. of Lincoln, Nebraska lost 8 pounds in the first week. By the end of the third week, she’d dropped 25 pounds and 3 dress sizes.\n Steven K. of Seattle, WA stayed on the Fat Decimator program for over two months and lost a whopping 68 pounds. He reversed his type 2 diabetes, dramatically reduced his joint pain and enjoys more energy, flexibility and happiness than he’s known since his 20’s.\n \n Put Fat Decimator to the test with absolutely no risk!\n \n Sharing Fat Decimator with the world has become what Kyle believes is a God-given mission. He explains his program and offers many free tips in his free presentation, which you can watch now by clicking this link.\n Further, unlike so many fitness and weight loss magic bullets, Fat Decimator is not expensive and is backed by a 60 day 100% money back guarantee.\n Don’t let another month go by wishing you could drop those unsightly pounds. Don’t spend any more time feeling self-conscious at the gym, or frustrated because the numbers on the scale just aren’t going in the right direction.\n Learn the simple, proven and highly effective method that’s helped over 50,000 regular folks just like you shed dozens of pounds rapidly, safely and enjoy the dramatic body transformation you’ve been dreaming about.\n \n \n Click here now\n and check out Kyle’s free presentation and open the door of opportunity to a whole new you.\n Scientific References\n 1. University of Florida. “New details linking stress, fat metabolism revealed.” ScienceDaily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160106125046.htm\n \n 2. Princeton University. “High-fructose corn syrup prompts considerably more weight gain, researchers find.” ScienceDaily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100322121115.htm\n \n 3. Uppsala University. “PCB exposure linked to increased abdominal fat.” ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120529102423.htm\n \n 4. Skidmore College. “Diet helps shed pounds, release toxins and reduce oxidative stress.” ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170111184102.htm\n \n 5. NIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. “Brain may flush out toxins during sleep; Sleep clears brain of molecules associated with neurodegeneration: Study.” ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131017144636.htm\n \n 6. (Karolinska Institutet. “Discovery explains how receptor regulates fat accumulation in obesity.” ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/08/140826085726.htm\n \n 7. Hazuda H, Fowler SP, Williams K. (June 27, 2011). The San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.\n 8. Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, et al. (October 9, 2014). Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature. 514, 181-186.\n 9. University of Georgia. “Spices May Protect Against Consequences of High Blood Sugar.” ScienceDaily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080805153830.htm\n \n 10. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/03/10/the-most-unhappy-of-pleasures-this-is-your-brain-on-sugar.aspx\n \n 11. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/06/08/7-healthy-foods-that-are-making-you-fat.aspx(http://www.today.com/health/7-healthy-foods-are-making-you-fat-2D79417570).\n 12. University of Georgia. “‘Diet’ products can make you fat, study shows.” ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170425140210.htm\n \n 13. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/11/26/12-worst-food-additives.aspx\n \n 14. Frank GK, Oberndorfer TA, Simmons AN, et al. Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener. Neuroimage. 2008;39:1559-69.\n 15. Bellisle F, Drewnowski A. Intense sweeteners, energy intake and the control of body weight. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61:691-700.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0980.065

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)→Same topicCardiovascular and exercise physiology→French-language works237,207→