MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904797266 · doi:10.1215/00138282-50.1.33

In the Echo Chamber

2012· article· en· W2904797266 on OpenAlexaff
Michael D. Snediker

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Language Notes · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPosthumanist Ethics and Activism
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)Object (grammar)Echo (communications protocol)ArtPaintingArt historyVisual artsPhilosophyPsychoanalysisLiteraturePsychologyComputer scienceLinguisticsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brian Teare meditates on the body in pain, on pain as a way to “mark” or “shape” the I. “I am made an object by pain” he writes, but then “who is the subject of pain”? Engaging Elaine Scarry, Maurice Blanchot, and the paintings of Agnes Martin, Teare asks how the “I” who feels pain can communicate such experience to others, and can thereby become once again a subject. Through the metaphors that art provides, Teare finds embodiment's approximate expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1450.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Language NotesSame topicPosthumanist Ethics and ActivismFrench-language works237,207