MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904797792 · doi:10.1109/antem.2018.8573035

Tissue-Type Imaging for Ultrasound-Prior Microwave Inversion

2018· article· en· W2904797792 on OpenAlexaff
Pedram Mojabi, Nasim Abdollahi, Muhammad Omer, Douglas Kurrant, Ian Jeffrey, Elise Fear, Joe LoVetri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowave imagingMicrowavePermittivityComputer scienceComputer visionIterative reconstructionInversion (geology)UltrasoundSegmentationArtificial intelligenceFinite element methodOpticsMaterials scienceAcousticsPhysicsGeologyOptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsDielectric

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we show results of applying the composite tissue-type imaging method to reconstructions of ultrasound-guided microwave inversions. Structural prior information about the object-of-interest undergoing quantitative microwave imaging is provided to the microwave inversion algorithm via an ultrasound ray-based imaging technique that utilizes a qualitative delay-and-sum method followed by K-means segmentation. The resulting segmented image is utilized as an inhomogeneous numerical background for the microwave finite-element Contrast Source Inversion algorithm. This prior information improves the reconstruction of the complex permittivity. Subsequently, the recently derived composite tissue-type imaging technique, which produces a tissue-type map along with a corresponding probability image, is applied to the reconstructed complex permittivity images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207