Patricia Lyfoung, une artiste engagée ? L’exemple de la bande dessinée La Rose Ecarlate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour but de mettre en avant la carrière de Patricia Lyfoung au sein de la bande dessinée française, ainsi que les expressions et les représentations de son héroïne la Rose Ecarlate. Si son parcours professionnel ne s'éloigne pas de celui de ses collègues masculins (école de dessin, fanzinat, dessin animé, bande dessinée), les contraintes imposées par sa qualité de femme l'obligent à se définir autrement. La Rose Ecarlate est l’héritière d’inspirations aussi diverses que le « trouble jeu » de la sexualité inhérent au shojo ou le modèle féministe proposé par le dessin animé Totally Spies (à l’écriture duquel l’auteure a longtemps contribué). Sous son masque, la Rose Ecarlate devient un personnage multidimensionnel, oscillant entre une femme sportive, aux origines hmong et à la politique engagée. En cela la Rose Ecarlate incarne un idéal féminin, celui du XXIème siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".