MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904825319 · doi:10.29173/af27237

Patricia Lyfoung, une artiste engagée ? L’exemple de la bande dessinée La Rose Ecarlate

2016· article· fr· W2904825319 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maxence Duarte

Bibliographic record

VenueALTERNATIVE FRANCOPHONE · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article a pour but de mettre en avant la carrière de Patricia Lyfoung au sein de la bande dessinée française, ainsi que les expressions et les représentations de son héroïne la Rose Ecarlate. Si son parcours professionnel ne s'éloigne pas de celui de ses collègues masculins (école de dessin, fanzinat, dessin animé, bande dessinée), les contraintes imposées par sa qualité de femme l'obligent à se définir autrement. La Rose Ecarlate est l’héritière d’inspirations aussi diverses que le « trouble jeu » de la sexualité inhérent au shojo ou le modèle féministe proposé par le dessin animé Totally Spies (à l’écriture duquel l’auteure a longtemps contribué). Sous son masque, la Rose Ecarlate devient un personnage multidimensionnel, oscillant entre une femme sportive, aux origines hmong et à la politique engagée. En cela la Rose Ecarlate incarne un idéal féminin, celui du XXIème siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueALTERNATIVE FRANCOPHONESame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207