MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904833574 · doi:10.1177/0962280218815301

Shape invariant mixture model for clustering non-linear longitudinal growth trajectories

2018· article· en· W2904833574 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistical Methods in Medical Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCluster analysisMarkov chain Monte CarloMixture modelComputer scienceInvariant (physics)Bayesian probabilityBayesian inferenceLinear modelLongitudinal dataInferenceMathematicsEconometricsApplied mathematicsData miningArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In longitudinal studies, it is often of great interest to cluster individual trajectories based on repeated measurements taken over time. Non-linear growth trajectories are often seen in practice, and the individual data can also be measured sparsely, and at irregular time points, which may complicate the modeling process. Motivated by a study of pregnant women hormone profiles, we proposed a shape invariant growth mixture model for clustering non-linear growth trajectories. Bayesian inference via Monte Carlo Markov Chain was employed to estimate the parameters of interest. We compared our model to the commonly used growth mixture model and functional clustering approach by simulation studies. Results from analyzing the real data and simulated data were presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it