MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904852606 · doi:10.4324/9781315174044-12

Epilogue – Peter Nils Grabosky

2018· book· en· W2904852606 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Roderic Broadhurst

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de MontréalAustralian Institute of CriminologyU.S. Air ForceAustralian National University
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This epilogue touches on qualities and interests that have so far evaded the contributions in this anthology by the author. Peter Grabosky&s;s engagement with all the authors&s; research on regulatory theory, policing, violence and cybercrime has been extensively covered, however the extraordinary diversity of Peter&s;s work and experience is perhaps less on display. In reflecting on Grabosky&s;s contribution to the study of crime and regulation, there are references made by the author regarding his work: murder-suicide, community policing and peacekeeping, Aboriginal deaths in custody, and explanations for the comparative variance in penal punishment. Grabosky served on the light cruiser USS Providence from 1966-1968, which had been refitted and commissioned as a guided missile light cruiser in 1959. His collaborative orientation and willingness to learn along with his students made for a generous and egalitarian atmosphere. It is this spirit that animates this anthology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeFrench-language works237,207