MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904858204

Prácticas de movilidad espacial y análisis de redes sociales en el estudio de las ciudades contemporáneas. Reseña de Globalised minds, roots in the city. Urban upper-middle clases in Europe.

2017· article· es· W2904858204 on OpenAlex
Natalia Cosacov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A lo largo del libro titulado Globalised minds, roots in the city -escrito por Alberta Andreotti, Patrick Le Galès y Francisco Javier Moreno Fuentes- prácticas de movilidad transnacional, decisiones de localización residencial, redes familiares y de amigos, prácticas de consumo diario, valores y actitudes se hilvanan con el propósito explícito de contribuir a comprender el grado de transnacionalismo y arraigo (o anclaje local) de managers del ámbito público y privado de cuatro ciudades europeas: París, Madrid, Milán y Lyon. De esta forma, los autores se proponen articular la dimensión transnacional y la dimensión urbana para comprender las prácticas de movilidad y anclaje de modo conjunto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it