Design and Characterization of a High-Speed Subsonic Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The high-speed aeroacoustic wind tunnel at Carleton University is a new facility commissioned with the purpose of facilitating experimental studies of turbulent boundary-layer (TBL)-induced surface pressure fluctuations. This research is primarily intended for applications related to aircraft cabin noise generation from structures exposed to high-speed flow. This open-jet blowdown wind tunnel is a unique facility in Canada and one of a few aeroacoustic wind tunnels in the world capable of achieving speeds up to Mach 0.8. Flow is delivered from a nozzle with dimensions of 6.1 by 15 cm to a test section enclosed within an anechoic chamber with internal dimensions of 1.9 by 0.88 by 1.95 m. This study details the complete design methodology for all major wind-tunnel components, including the numerical simulations performed in the validation of the designed components. The results of the test section background noise levels and TBL surface pressure fluctuation spectral behavior developed over a flat test section plate are compared with established data and empirical models available in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".