Hardware and software architecture of intelligent vehicles and road verification in typical traffic scenarios
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intellectualisation is one of the three reforming technologies in automotive industry, which is now changing the mobility mode and human society. High safety and intelligence are the pre‐requisites for putting self‐driving vehicles into markets. This study presents the hardware and software architecture for intelligent vehicles, as well as their road verification in typical traffic scenarios. The hardware system includes environmental sensors, computing platforms, vehicle actuators, and vehicle platforms, which is able to provide redundant protection against the main controller failure. The software system includes environmental perception module, scene cognition module, decision and control module, human–computer interaction module and public service support module. To evaluate the performance of the developed architecture, the road tests of automated driving system were carried out in two typical traffic scenarios, including: (i) closed road test in Yuanboyuan region; (ii) open road test on Beijing‐Tianjin highway. The real road test shows that the designed hardware and software systems for intelligent vehicles have desirable robustness, which can realise accurate and reliable environment perception, decision‐making and motion control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it