Lyme Regis Revisited: The Geological Landscape in Joan Thomas’s Curiosity, A Love Story
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le deuxième roman de la canadienne Joan Thomas se déroule à Lyme Regis, petite ville du Dorset servant également de cadre à quelques grands classiques de la littérature anglaise, de Persuasion à The French Lieutenant’s Woman. Bien que Curiosity ait sa place dans le courant en vogue de la littérature néo-victorienne, le récit y suit une logique différente de celle de la simple rétrospection. La géologie offre un autre prisme à travers lequel observer le littoral du Dorset et le rôle que ses paysages côtiers ont joué dans une géographie littéraire promouvant une insularité souvent synonyme d’anglicité. S’appuyant sur la critique de la visibilité née des essais de Georges Didi-Huberman, cet article s’attachera à montrer comment le paysage géologique de Curiosity est constitué de strates mémorielles héritées d’un passé pour partie effacé dont il importe néanmoins de saisir l’étendue première.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.043 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".