MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904979023 · doi:10.4000/ebc.4663

Lyme Regis Revisited: The Geological Landscape in Joan Thomas’s Curiosity, A Love Story

2018· article· fr· W2904979023 on OpenAlex
Claire Omhovère

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes britanniques contemporaines · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le deuxième roman de la canadienne Joan Thomas se déroule à Lyme Regis, petite ville du Dorset servant également de cadre à quelques grands classiques de la littérature anglaise, de Persuasion à The French Lieutenant’s Woman. Bien que Curiosity ait sa place dans le courant en vogue de la littérature néo-victorienne, le récit y suit une logique différente de celle de la simple rétrospection. La géologie offre un autre prisme à travers lequel observer le littoral du Dorset et le rôle que ses paysages côtiers ont joué dans une géographie littéraire promouvant une insularité souvent synonyme d’anglicité. S’appuyant sur la critique de la visibilité née des essais de Georges Didi-Huberman, cet article s’attachera à montrer comment le paysage géologique de Curiosity est constitué de strates mémorielles héritées d’un passé pour partie effacé dont il importe néanmoins de saisir l’étendue première.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it