MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904991380 · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2886230

A High-Speed, Scalable, and Programmable Traffic Manager Architecture for Flow-Based Networking

2018· article· en· W2904991380 on OpenAlexafffund
Imad Benacer, François-Raymond Boyer, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayScalabilityEmbedded systemNetwork packetPacket processingNetwork processorScheduling (production processes)Software-defined networkingComputer networkForwarding planeComputer architectureOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a programmable and scalable traffic manager (TM) architecture, targeting requirements of high-speed networking devices, especially in the software-defined networking context. This TM is intended to ease the deployability of new architectures through field-programmable gate array (FPGA) platforms and to make the data plane programmable and scalable. Flow-based networking allows treating traffic in terms of flows rather than as a simple aggregation of individual packets, which simplifies scheduling and bandwidth allocation for each flow. Programmability brings agility, flexibility, and rapid adaptation to changes, allowing to meet network requirements in real-time. Traffic management with fast queuing and reduced latency plays an important role to support the upcoming 5G cellular communication technology. The proposed TM architecture is coded in C++ and is synthesized with the Vivado High-Level Synthesis tool. This TM is capable of supporting links operating beyond 40 Gb/s, on the ZC706 board and XCVU440-FLGB2377–3-E FPGA device from Xilinx, while achieving 80 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s throughput, respectively. The resulting placed and routed design was tested on the ZC706 board with its embedded ARM processor controlling table updates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207