The challenging parallelism of rights claims based on religious identity and on sexual identity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter examines some issues behind the Canadian debate over the proposed opening of a Christian law school, the potential Trinity Western University (TWU) law school. It explores the parallelism between claims being put to manifest religious identity and claims being put to manifest sexual identity, trying in the process to show the seriousness of each manifestation of identity through reference to deeper historical roots and pertinent contextual considerations. The chapter considers whether either side has an easy way out of this parallelism, by which it can claim that its claims should be respected but the other side's should not, ultimately concluding that the established parallelism calls for legal respect for both claims. Finally, it shows the implications that result, which include TWU's legal ability to open a law school but that involve a middle path different from that which its advocates might prefer, with a suggestion that solutions within the debate similarly need to be built upon considered foundations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it