MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905005986 · doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00666

Genetic Variants Associated With Neurodegenerative Diseases Regulate Gene Expression in Immune Cell CD14+ Monocytes

2018· article· en· W2905005986 on OpenAlexaff
Jingyi Sun, Ya‐Jun Hou, Yan Zhang, Longcai Wang, Lidong Liu, Bao‐liang Sun, Hui Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Genetics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsExpression quantitative trait lociCD14BiologyGenome-wide association studyImmune systemGeneLRRK2MonocyteDiseaseGeneticsQuantitative trait locusLocus (genetics)Gene expressionImmunologyMedicineSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypePathologyMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Until now, large-scale genome-wide association studies have identified 94 genes associated with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and multiple sclerosis. Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis showed that six genetic variants around six of these 94 genes could drive both disease susceptibility and altered expression of six nearby genes including CD33 (rs3865444), PILRB (rs1476679), NUP160 (rs10838725), LRRK2 (rs76904798), RGS1 (rs1323292), and METTL21B (rs701006). However, two of these six genetic variants rs1476679 and rs76904798 variants could regulate the expression of PILRB and LRRK2 only in the human monocyte-derived microglia-like (MDMi) cells, but not in human peripheral blood monocytes. Here, we aim to verify these findings using another two eQTL datasets in human peripheral blood immune cell CD14+ monocytes. The results that showed that rs1476679 and rs76904798 variants or their proxy variants could significantly regulate the expression of PILRB and LRRK2 in immune cell CD14+ monocytes and human peripheral blood. We believe that these findings provide important supplementary information about the regulatory mechanisms by which both variants influence PILRB and LRRK2 gene expression and neurodegenerative disease risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in GeneticsSame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207