MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905043326 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.2887

Chapitre 2. Fonctions exécutives et cognition sociale : un modèle neuropsychologique

2015· book-chapter· fr· W2905043326 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christian C. Joyal, Antoine de Chantérac, Monique Tardif

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Representations and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selon l’Association des centres jeunesse du Québec, 25 % des cas de viols et de 40 à 50 % des cas d’abus sexuels envers des enfants sont commis par des adolescents (ACJQ, 2008). Environ 20 % des adolescents auteurs d’agressions sexuelles récidiveront à l’âge adulte (Långström, Grann et Lindblad, 2000 ; Seto, 2008), 10 % récidiveront au cours des 5 années suivant le premier abus (Caldwell, 2002 ; Worling et Långström, 2006) et 30 % au cours des 25 années suivant ce premier abus (McCann et Luss...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicSocial Representations and IdentityFrench-language works237,207