Makran continental margin sedimentation during the Late Holocene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sedimentation in the Makran active margin is governed by a complex interaction of atmospheric, tectonics, and hydrodynamic setting of the northern flank of the Gulf of Oman. The mixed clastic carbonate sediments in the tectonically and hydrodynamically active environment have complicated the distribution pattern. The region is suffering from basic sedimentological data, and specifically, the sedimentation history of the Holocene deposits has been rarely studied in the Iranian coast. To deal with this deficiency, surface and core sediment samples from the Iranian continental shelf and upper slope of the Gulf of Oman have been studied using standard sedimentological techniques. The overall sediment distribution pattern demonstrates that the grain size gradually decreases from the shoreline to the deeper zones. However, some medium- to coarse-grained sand patches can be found in the deeper parts, especially in the middle part of the studied area that can be related to sediment supply of ephemeral rivers discharging into the sea in rainy seasons and (or) high-energy events (i.e., turbidites and tsunamis during the Holocene). Several horizons of the coarse-grained detrital sediments are detectable in the upper slope sediment cores. The coarse-grained materials are received from the hinterland during flash floods and could be accumulated due to mass wasting events. The elevated amount of organic materials in the upper slope indicates a deficit of dissolved oxygen that leads to preservation of organic materials in the bottom sediments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".