Ontario’s managed forests and harvested wood products contribute to greenhouse gas mitigation from 2020 to 2100
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We used an integrated approach to estimate the greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential of Ontario’s forestry sector, defined as the managed forests and the harvested wood products (HWP) originating from these forests. The 44.7 million ha of managed forests in this study included Crown forests designated as 41 forest management units (FMUs) for timber harvesting, productive forests north of the area of undertaking, large parks, and private forest land. Forests and HWP were simulated from approximately 2010 to 2100, with carbon (C) stocks and emissions reported for the period 2020 to 2100. A baseline scenario was defined to represent business as usual forestry operations in Ontario, in which the 41 FMUs and the private forests were harvested at historical (1990–2009) rates, and HWP production and end uses were assumed to follow Ontario’s historical values (1991–2010). In the baseline scenario, the forest C stocks were projected to increase from 7229.7 million tonnes (Mt C) in 2020 to 7424 Mt C in 2100. Th...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".