Indice des prix des produits de base a long terme de la Banque du Canada, 1870 a 2015
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Canada est une nation commerçante qui produit des quantités importantes d’extrants liées aux ressources. Ainsi, le comportement des prix des ressources qui revêtent de l’importance pour le Canada est pertinent, afin de comprendre les progrès de la croissance des revenus réels et la prospérité du pays et des provinces. Les brusques variations de la demande et de l’offre ou les changements à la politique monétaire sur les marchés internationaux peuvent avoir une énorme influence sur le prix des ressources. Les fluctuations sont un facteur important de transmission des bouleversements externes au sein de l’économie nationale. Le présent document comporte des estimations historiques de l’indice des prix des produits de base de la Banque du Canada (IPPB) et les couple à des estimations modernes. Au moyen d’un ensemble de sources de données historiques, il évalue les poids et les prix d’une manière suffisamment cohérente pour permettre l’établissement d’estimations à long terme qui pourraient être couplées à l’IPPB de Fisher moderne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".