MECHANISMS OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE OF DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF THE POOR PEOPLE IN CAIRO - AN ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study drives at identifying the mechanisms of environmental convenience for divergent classes of Cairo city. The sample is applied on (150) male/female individuals using the Scale of Environmental Convenience as a means for collecting data to be applied on a sample of the poor (Monshaat Naser quarter – Roud El-Farag quarter – Al-Megawreen cemetery). The researcher uses the social survey method for deducing social reality and analyzes the problem ecologically and for giving a conception of quality of life. The researcher uses multiple theories such as (Psychological analysis of Freud – The behavioral school – The human school – the ecological system theory). The research comes to several results which most important are: there are significant statistical differences between the study sample (tomb’ residents/slum quarter) on Scale of Environmental Convenience. The study recommends giving more consideration and concern to that marginalized category in order to improve their conditions and overcome the diseases they are exposed to because of lack of cleanness, establishing as well some projects to overcome the unemployment problem and improve the condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".