MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905319669 · doi:10.1002/pamm.201800273

Pareto Front Interpolation Based on Parametric Sensitivity Analysis in a Bi‐Objective Setting

2018· article· en· W2905319669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePAMM · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)Parametric statisticsSensitivity (control systems)Multi-objective optimizationMathematical optimizationPareto principleMathematicsFront (military)ExploitPareto optimalPolynomialApplied mathematicsAlgorithmComputer scienceStatisticsEngineeringMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper shows how a discrete approximation of a Pareto front can be refined with polynomial interpolation. For this we exploit the information given by the discrete samples of the Pareto front and in addition we use parametric sensitivity information from these samples. The pararmetric sensitivities are afterwards used to ensure feasibility of the obtained interpolated solutions by applying an iterative self correction algorithm. Results are shown for an bi‐objective example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it