MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905326499 · doi:10.1109/antem.2018.8572993

Air Quality Monitoring Using UWB Radar

2018· article· en· W2905326499 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadarCarbon nanotubeWirelessCoupling (piping)Materials scienceRadar engineering detailsRemote sensingElectronic engineeringRange (aeronautics)Computer scienceRadar imagingEngineeringTelecommunicationsNanotechnologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon nanotubes (CNT) have exceptional electrical properties that make them likely candidates for Iow cost wireless gas sensors. In this work, we present a novel design scheme for a low-cost ammonia gas sensor utilizing an UWB radar operating in the 3-10 GHz range. When exposed to gas, significant changes in the amplitudes of the backscattered signals of the CNT films are observed. Coupling of a CNT-based passive sensor with the radar enables remote gas detection with high selectivity, at a considerably lower cost in comparison to most commercially available gas sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it