Design and Simulation of Wireless Power Transfer System for Brain Implant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
All over the world, there are great research efforts in order to improve human being's quality life, especially on medical and biomedical applications. Hence, one found several inventions in this area, among them Implantable Medical Devices Systems (IMDs) called also implants. Depending on the application, these devices have regrouped in two categories active and passive. Any time when IMDs are active, they require energy to function properly. Since 1958, several techniques have been proposed in order to address their need of power. Actually, a promising technique, called Near-Field Resonant Coupling (NFRC) is used for wirelessly charging modern implants. In this work, one designed a NFRC wireless power transfer system for powering brain implant. To simulate the system, one employed or Cad software. The delivered power in the transmitter circuit is 1Watt. Simulation results show that the system can transfer wirelessly 0.16 Whatt of power to the receiver circuit that can be employable to supply brain implant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".