MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P5798Prevalence of interatrial block and its association with specific coronary arteries in patients with ST- segment elevated myocardial infarction

2018· article· en· W2905374907 on OpenAlexaff
Göksel Çinier, Ahmet İlker Tekkeşin, Duygu Genç, Ümmügülsüm Yıldız-Altay, Kemal Emrecan Parsova, Levent Pay, Bryce Alexander, Ceyhan Türkkan, A. Taha Alper, Adrián Baranchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCoronary arteriesArtery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Interatrial block (IAB), defined as P wave duration greater than 120 milliseconds (ms), is strongly associated with recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in different clinical scenarios. Ischemia is considered as one of the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of IAB by contributing atrial fibrosis. Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between culprit coronary artery lesion with the presence of IAB and newly detected AF at 12 months. Methods: Patients that are presented to our hospital with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and received successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) were prospectively enrolled to the study. Surface electrocardiography (ECG) of all patients were recorded on admission and at 6th hour post P-PCI. Patients were screened for the occurrence of AF at 12 months visit. Results: The present study included 198 patients. IAB was detected in 102 (51.5%) patients on admission. Patients with an obstruction in only right coronary vasculature [63 (61.8%) vs 40 (41.7%); P<0.01] and in more than one coronary artery [56 (54.9%) vs 34 (35.4%); P<0.01] had a greater prevalence of IAB. Presence of IAB was reduced to 47 (23.7%) patients at 6th hour. AF was detected in 17.7% of study patients at 12 months. Presence of both p-IAB [15 (42.9%) vs 23 (14.1%); P<0.01] and a-IAB [7 (20%) vs 2 (1.2%); P<0.01] at 6th hour P-PCI and obstruction in more than one coronary artery [25 (71.4) vs 65 (39.9); P<0.01]. predicted the new onset AF at 12 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207